ACIST CVi™
Contrast Delivery System
ACIST CVi™
Contrast Delivery System
CVi delivers the power to improve patient safety, minimizing the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) for coronary catheterizations when compared to manual injection of contrast media.
It’s the contrast injector for:
- Interventional cardiologists who want to regulate contrast injection flow and minimize risk of CI-AKI—also referred to as contrast induced nephropathy (CIN)
- Hospital administrators interested in cost containment through cath lab safety and efficiency and reducing potential patient post-procedure adverse events
Optimize Contrast Supply with ACIST CViTM
Stability, Agility and Durability
New transducer arms are now available for ACIST CVi® Contrast Delivery systems
The new design has improved range of motion and is easily lockable in any position. An ergonomic wingnut provides quick and easy adjustment while the solid aluminum construction ensures durability.
Increasing safety and operational efficiency
Increasing patient safety
Up to 30% reduction in CI-AKI vs. manual injection.1
CI-AKI incremental cost range: $13,294 to $14,266.2*
Increasing patient safety
~25% reduction in contrast use without compromising image quality when comparing 4 Fr to 6 Fr diagnostic procedures.3
Bleeding and contrast use were significantly reduced with 5 Fr catheters compared to 6 Fr.4
Increasing workplace safety
Up to 50% reduction in clinician radiation exposure by stepping back.5,6
Increasing workplace safety
Increasing operational efficiency
45 mL decrease per case when injector used.9
There is up to $0.30/mL savings in wasted contrast media.
Increasing operational efficiency
Average 5 min faster per procedure10
Time saved may allow for additional procedures to be performed in a day.10
*P<0.05 CVi vs. manual injection
Watch the overview
See system highlights and other CVi features.
- * The cost was reported in 2010 USD and inflated to 2018 USD using the medical care component of the CPI index.
** The air column detection sensor is designed to aid the user in the detection of air in the injecting line, but it is not designed to replace the vigilance and care required of the operator in visually inspecting for air and clearing air.
- Call J, Sacrinty M, Applegate R, et al. Automated contrast injection in contemporary practice during cardiac catheterization and PCI: effects on contrast-induced nephropathy. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18(10):469-474.
- Amin A, Sharpiro R, Novak E, et al. Costs of contrast induced acute kidney injury. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2018;6(suppl 1):A316.
- Khoukaz S, Kern M, Bitar S, et al. Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with Acisted power injection. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2001;52:393-398.
- Polimeni A, Passafaro F, De Rosa S, et al. Clinical and procedural outcomes of 5-French versus 6-French sheaths in transradial coronary interventions. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(52):e2170.
- Goldstein JA, Kern M, Wilson R. A novel automated injection system for angiography. J Interv Cardiol. 2001;14(2):147-152.
- Larsen AS, Osteras BH. Step back from the patient: reduction of radiation dose to the operator by the systematic use of an automatic power injector for contrast media in an interventional angiography suite. Acta Radiol. 2012;53(3):330-334.
- Klein LW, Tra Y, Garratt KN, et al. Occupational health hazards of interventional cardiologists in the current decade: results of the 2014 SCAI membership survey. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(5):913-924.
- Holton M. Ergonomics revisited: carpal tunnel syndrome. https://www.cathlabdigest.com/articles/Erogonomics-Revisited-Carpal-Tunnel-Syndrome. Updated March 2005. Accessed: September 26, 2018.
- Minsinger KD, Kassis HM, Block CA. Meta-analysis of the effect of automated contrast injection devices versus manual injection and contrast volume on risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(1):49-53.
- Lehmann C, Hotaling M. Saving time, saving money: a time and motion study with contrast management systems. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17(2):118-121;quiz 122.