FEATURED TECHNOLOGY

ULTRA-LOW CONTRAST IMAGING AND PCI WITH ACIST TECHNOLOGY

Sponsored by ACIST

Ultra-Low Contrast Imaging and PCI

Minimizing contrast volume in angiography and PCI.

By Ziad A. Ali, MD, DPhil

Minimizing the contrast exposure and possibly using the least nephrotoxic contrast are critical in angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Multiple exposures, especially within a short period of time (24-72 hours) can increase the risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI)’ and should be avoided. We have established a strategy for “ultra-low” contrast angiography (ULCA) at St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center (Figure 1).

HYDRATION

It is firmly established that intravenous volume hydration reduces the incidence of CA-AKI. By expanding plasma volume, hydration reduces the contrast concentration and increases renal blood flow and tubular urine, reducing contrast retention and thereby its direct toxic effect.’ To achieve optimal hydration without increasing the risk of pulmonary edema, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)-guided hydration has become the preferred method based on the results of the POSEIDON trial2. It should be noted that in this study, the mean baseline serum creatinine was 1.4 mg/dL, with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 47.5 mL/min. While the benefits of intravenous hydration can probably be extrapolated to more advanced stages of CKD (stages 4 and 5), further studies are needed to establish whether hydration alone would have a similar impact on the rates of CA-AKl in this higher-risk group of patients. We have shown previously that in patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m? volume status cannot be predicted by clinical examination, and that pre- emptive hydration may lead to potentially hazardous volume overload and resultant pulmonary edema. As a result, we do not suggest pre-hydration and base hydration solely on intraprocedural LVEDP, implementing the POSEIDON protocol at half the infusion rates.

CATHETER ENGAGEMENT

Pre-empted by LVEDP-guided intraprocedural hydration, for ULCA, contrast volume should be limited to a maximum contrast volume/eGFR ratio < 1. Both we and others have validated contrast volume/eGFR as a measure of adverse events as a result of exposure to radiocontrast, with contrast volume/eGFR > 1 exponentially increasing the risk of CA-AKI in late-stage CKD.> As part of a ULCA strategy, two techniques can be used to confirm catheter engagement in the coronary. First, when the operator believes that the catheter is fully engaged, injection of 5 to 10 mL of saline is used to induce repolarization changes on electrocardiographic monitoring. The catheterization lab staff should be warned about repolarization abnormalities to prevent misinterpretation of acute ischemia (Figure 2). If, after multiple attempts, repolarization abnormalities cannot be determined, a Tuohy-Borst adapter is connected to the diagnostic catheter, analogous to attachment to a guide catheter, and, after heparinization, the introduction of a workhorse coronary guidewire is repeatedly attempted (rather than “test” contrast injections) until it successfully advances into the coronary artery.

CONTRAST INJECTION

Once the catheter is engaged, meticulous techniques are used to minimize the contrast administered in a limited number of angiographic projections (Figure 2), both in the native CAD“ and graft conduits® While a traditional manifold may be used, the ACIST CVi® Contrast Delivery System (ACIST Medical Systems) provides the advantage of controlled volume and rise settings, along with recordings of injection volumes for record keeping. Typically, a single left anterior oblique (LAO)/cranial projection is used to visualize the right coronary artery and its major tributary branches. In the left coronary artery, an anterior-posterior (AP)/caudal injection is used for visualization of the left main coronary artery and the circumflex artery and its branches. This is followed by an AP/cranial injection for visualization of the left anterior descending artery and its branches. A typical ULCA can be performed with < 10 mL of contrast dye, as outlined in Figure 2. Although the ACIST CVi® Contrast Delivery System is preferred with a rapid rise time and contrast injection limited to 5 mL, a manifold system may also be used. Using a manifold system, brisk injections of contrast, with either a 3- or 5-mL syringe, can help limit injection volume. Irrespectively, cessation of injection as the vessel fully opacifies, rather than until contrast fills the distal vessel, is preferred for ULCA. In a single-center, non-randomized, propensity-matched observational cohort, ULCA reduced the risk of CA-AKl and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) compared with standard angiography in late-stage CKD during a 24-month follow-up period.

PHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

When angiographically ambiguous lesions are present, adjunctive tests such as coronary physiology are used to further assess lesion severity (Figure 3). The Navvus II° Rapid Exchange FFR microcatheter (ACIST Medical Systems) is an elegant way to perform physiological assessment in ambiguous lesions because the microcatheter may be used with a standard workhorse wire, with potential safety advantages over other wire-based physiology devices, such as wire-induced dissection and inadvertent passage into small vessels.

PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION

“Zero-contrast” PCl, which is typically a staged procedure in non-ACS patients, is a strategy for PCI without using, or drastically minimizing, contrast in late-stage CKD. The previously performed ULCA serves as the blueprint or roadmap.* Staging the procedure allows for a reduction in the total contrast exposure, recovery of kidney function, and discussion of the risks and benefits of zero-contrast PCl with the patient. Previously obtained diagnostic angiograms are displayed and used as a roadmap for guide catheter engagement and guide- wire advancement. The shapeable tips of the guidewire are typically looped whenever possible to decrease the chances of distal vessel perforation. Use of several guide-wires is recommended to generate a metallic silhouette or coronary skeleton of the target vessel and its branches (Figures 3 and 4). The procedure is then guided by intravascular imaging (ultrasound* or optical coherence tomography with saline flush®) with or without coronary physiology. Coregistration of physiology and intracornary imaging pullback with the wire silhouette allows for contrast-free localization of flow-limiting stenoses, vessel segments that require plaque preparation, optimal stent landing zones, and choosing stent size and length. After stent implantation, the same approach can be followed to verify the results of PC or to guide optimization, also with the use of stent enhancement tools, all without the need for contrast injections. Prespecified criteria indicating procedural complications or suboptimal results are devised to guide the use of contrast to perform angiography during the zero-contrast procedure, if indicated.” These include unresolved electrocardiogram changes or symptoms, hemodynamic instability, failure of physiological parameters to improve, or the presence of a new
effusion on echocardiography (Figure 1).

An initial report in 35 patients with eGFR 16 + 8 mL/min/1.73m? supported the feasibility and safety of this approach, resulting in preserved postprocedural kidney function in all patients and no need for RRT. A prospective, single-center, propensity-matched
comparison with standard angiography alone showed that combined ULCA and zero-contrast PC was associated with a significant reduction in the rates of RRT within a 12-month follow-up period (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% Cl, 0.21-0.75; P = 0032). Given the frequent presence of severe calcification, atherectomy may be needed during zero-contrast PCl to modify the fibro-calcific plagues and optimize PCI results.” The recent advent of intravascular lithotripsy, which is a balloon catheter-based technique, may simplify calcific plaque modification as part of zero-contrast PCL” The feasibility of zero-contrast PCl has also been shown in complex lesions (such as chronic total occlusions’ and high-risk PCI with hemodynamic support or in vein grafts’). Randomized studies are warranted to further establish the role of ULCA and zero-contrast PCl as part of the invasive management strategy for coronary artery disease in late-stage CKD.

CONCLUSION

Patients at risk of CA-AKI should be carefully assessed before cardiovascular procedures that involve using contrast media. Patients with multiple risk factors, especially those with baseline CKD, heart failure, and diabetes are at a particularly high risk of CA-AKI. Various risk scores have been proposed and tested but their routine use is hampered by inadequate validation.

Modifiable patient- and procedure-related factors should be corrected prior to angiography. At present, intravenous hydration is the only evidence-based strategy for prevention of CA-AKI and normal saline is the preferred solution. The aim is to achieve optimal volume expansion without increasing the risk of pulmonary edema. Because patients with advanced CKD, particularly those in stage 5 CKD who are not on maintenance dialysis, may have fluid retention, intravenous hydration is best initiated during the procedure after the LVEDP is measured. Principles of ULCA and staged zero-contrast PCl have been described and widely adopted.

Interventionalists ought to learn the techniques, in particular the use of intravascular imaging, to perform PCI safely and effectively in patients with advanced CKD without compromising the residual kidney function. Finally, novel biomarkers and pharmaceutical agents targeting the pathogenic pathways involved in CA-AKI should be developed and validated in large-scale clinical trials.

 


 

1. van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, et al. Post-contrast acute kidney injury – part 1: definition, dinical
features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors: recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium
Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2018,28:2845-2855. doi: 10.1007/500330-017-5246-5

2. Brar SS, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, et al. Haemodynarmic-guided fluid administration for the prevention of
contrast-induced acute kidney injury: the POSEIDON randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383:1814-1823.
dof: 10.1016/50140-6736(14)60689-9

3. Ali ZA, Escaned J, Dudek D, et al. Strategies for renal protection in cardiovascular interventions. Korean Circ J.
2022,52:485-495. doi: 10.4070/k¢}.2022.0093

4. Ali ZA, Karimi Galougahi K, Nazif T, et al. Imaging- and physiol ogy-guiced percutaneous coronary intervention
without contrast administration in advanced renal failure: a feasibility, safety, and outcome study. Eur Heart J.
2016,37:3090-3095. doi: 10.1093 /eurheartj/ehw(78

5. Nyman U, Bjork J, Aspelin P, Marenzi G. Contrast medium dose-to-GFR ratio: a measure of systemic exposure
10 predict contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Radiol. 2008,49:658-667.
dof: 10.1080/02841850802050762

6. Rahim HAM, Flattery E, Gkargkoulas F, et al. Ultra-low-contrast angiography in patients with advanced chronic
kidney disease and previous coronary artery bypass surgery. Coron Artery Dis. 2019;30:346-351. doi: 10.1097/
MCA.0000000000000741

7. Bhatti N, Rahim H, Chen S et al. Ultra-low contrast coronary angiography in patients with advanced chronic
kidney disease: feasibility and outcomes compared with conventional angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019,74(13
suppl):B30.

8. Karimi Galougahi K, Zalewski A, Leon MB, et al. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous

coronary interventionin pre-terminal chronic kidney disease with no radio-contrast administration. Eur Heart J.
2016,37:1059. doi: 10.1093 /eurheartj/ehv667

9. Rahim H, Flattery E, Gkargkoulas F, et al. Clinical outcomes of imaging- and physiology-guided PCI without
contrast administration in advanced renal failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019,74(13 suppl):B32.

Sponsored by ACIST

10. Karimi Galougahi K, Mintz GS, Karmpaliotis D, All ZA. Zero-contrast percutaneous coronary intervention on
caldfied lesions facilitated by rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017,90:E85-E89. doi: 10.1002/
d.26999

11. Karimi Galougahi K, Patel S, Shlofrmitz RA, et al. Calcific plague modification by acoustic shockwaves – intravas-
alar lithotripsy in coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e009354. dof: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVEN-
TIONS.120.009354

12. Hater R, Finn MT, Riley RF, et al. Zero contrast retrograde chronic total occlusions percutaneous coronary
intervention: a case series. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2018,2:1-5. doi: 10.1093 /ehjcr/yty036

13. Madhavan MV, Prasad M, Fall KN, et al. Zero-contrast multivessel revascularization for acute coronary syn-
drome in a patient with chronic kidney disease. JACC Case Rep. 2019,1:774-780. doi: 10.1016/]jaccas.2019.11.006
14. Parviz Y, Fall K, Stone GW, et al. Imaging and physiology to guide venous graft interventions without contrast
administration in advanced renal failure. J Invasive Cardiol. 2017,29:E163-E165.

Ziad A. Ali, MD, DPhil

The Heart Center

DeMatteis Cardiovascular Institute
St. Francis Hospital

Roslyn, New York

Clinical Trials Center

Cardiovascular Research Foundation
New York, New York

(516) 562-6624; ziad.ali@chsli.org
Disclosures: St. Francis Hospital and
Heart Center receive institutional grant
support from ACIST Medical.

VOL.16, NO. 4 JULY/AUGUST 2022 INSERT TO CARDIAC INTERVENTIONS TODAY 31

Interested in learning more?

Contact a rep to learn more about ACIST products. 

GENERAL CONDITIONS OF SALE

Skip to content